Figure 1 — Yodacom Research · LPIS Series · 2026-06-15
Rating Inversion: Higher-Rated Coins Are Worse LP Candidates
RXI-gated net APY on total capital vs. 50/50 HODL benchmark, by CoinRoc coin rating tier · Arbitrum · $5,000 capital · 5,000-iteration Monte Carlo simulation
RXI-Gated LP Net APY
Always-In LP Net APY
50/50 HODL Benchmark
+40% +20% 0% −20% −40% −60% 0% +4.9% +3.1% HODL +10.9% A-tier ETH, BTC, SOL Loss freq 42.4% +21.3% +15.5% HODL +15.8% LP SWEET SPOT Loss freq 34.9% B-tier LINK, AAVE, UNI, ARB, AVAX −23.3% −24.2% HODL +20.7% Loss freq 79.7–82.9% C-tier DOT, ADA, ATOM, NEAR, INJ −53.6% −60.6% HODL +42.2% Loss freq 97.7% D-tier BONK, WIF, PEPE Zero return
Simulation disclosure: Based on 5,000-iteration Monte Carlo simulation calibrated to live GeckoTerminal pool data (2026-06-15). Capital: $5,000 on Arbitrum. Strategy A = always-in passive LP. Strategy B = RXI-gated LP (deploy only in ranging regimes). Strategy C = 50/50 HODL. Net APY on total capital using 3-3-3 model (2/3 deployed). 95% confidence intervals: A-tier RXI-gated [+2.7%, +3.4%]; B-tier RXI-gated [+14.3%, +16.1%]; C-tier RXI-gated [−25.4%, −23.6%]; D-tier RXI-gated [−61.3%, −60.3%]. Tick-level historical data validation pending (Priority 1, RES-LPIS-EMPIRICAL-01). Not a projection of future returns. See full methodology at RES-LPIS-EMPIRICAL-01.